Like all her positions from what I have rad but as a progressive and would NOT vote for Williamson- She is not even CLOSE to qualified. She is already trying to play spoiler by "warning" younger voters will stay home if Biden is nominee. Isn't that also very self-serving?

She also apparently has a temper, abusing staff during her last campaign.

I won't get all the progressive positions out of a Biden admin, but we will get some. We will get none from a GOP administration and especially not a Trump term.

As of March 8th, 77 percent of potential Democratic primary voters prefer the incumbent, while 4 percent would go with Williamson. A 73 point gap. What percent she should have before a debate should be demanded?

Biden wasn't my first choice last time either, but he hasn't done too madly. And some of the legislation he signed does tilt progressive to a degree. If one expects to get a full blown progressive president from the current population of voters, that's fantasy.

It's not smugness for a political party to run with their incumbent- challenging an incumbent weakens that candidate in the general election. Other factors entered in but Reagan undermined Ford and Kennedy undermined Carter.

Also mis-framing the percent of people who do not want Biden to run is inapplicable. Basically they would like someone else is what they said, but since there is NOT someone else that is VIABLE- 77% support Biden